Visiting a Mega-Church
By Trevin Wax on Mar 25, 2009 in Uncategorized |
Print This Post | Share (Twitter, Email, Facebook)
Earlier this week, I reflected on a visit to a Roman Catholic church. Today, I am putting down some reflections about a recent visit to a megachurch.
I read recently that some people are attending churches “undercover,” much like mystery shoppers who frequent restaurants and stores and report on their findings. I deplore the consumerist mindset that treats the church as just another company.
But I wonder if our churches might not benefit from “undercover” visitors who take stock of every aspect of the worship, looking for the message of the gospel? How many churches could we attend without hearing about Christ crucified? How many ”worship sets” do we sing that leave out the cross and resurrection? What view would one have of God if they sat through just one typical evangelical worship service?
The irony you will soon discover in the following description of a megachurch visit is that the Roman Catholics read more Scripture in worship than we evangelicals do. And we’re the ones who believe sola Scriptura, right?
Here are some thoughts on my mega-church visit…
A service at this church is a massive endeavor which takes a tremendous number of volunteers and paid workers. Once we arrived at the entrance to the building, the doors were opened by greeters who said, “Good evening,” and “Hi, how are you?”. Once inside, another lady greeted us and told us she was glad that we were there. My wife and I made our way to the nursery wing, where we dropped off our son. The nursery is filled with volunteers that stay with the children during the service. Smiling ushers led us to our seats on the bottom floor in the towering auditorium.
The service began with a man who was leading the church in singing as he played the piano. He was joined onstage by several other people who sang as well. The orchestra and band were hidden down below the choir loft. The ushers that greeted us at the door were involved in serving Communion at the appropriate time. Some of the people on staff baptized new converts at one point during the service.
The senior minister preached the sermon and went down front afterwards to greet people coming forward at the invitation. Many other counselors, elders and ushers were involved in this part of the service as well. There were probably more than 500 total people working to make this service possible.
Several things strike me as being important to the planners of this worship service. First, professionalism is definitely a goal of the worship team and musicians. The music and singing from onstage is executed so well that no awkwardness exists at all. A strong sense of professionalism pervades the atmosphere. Everything done must be top-notch.
Another important factor for the planners is efficiency. The service begins and ends at a certain time, leaving little room for flexibility. It is amazing that so much is accomplished during this worship service within the time constraints of one hour.
Another important factor is outreach. The people are friendly to visitors and church members demonstrate a genuine caring attitude. The music was contemporary, and the sermon seemed relevant to believers and non-believers alike.
The auditorium is built like a 3-tiered stadium. Since it seats thousands of people it is very easy to feel lost within the massive space. There was a cross on the wall behind the stage, as well as a dove that signified the Holy Spirit. Other than these two wall fixtures, nothing would have communicated to an outsider that this was indeed a church sanctuary. The facility is immensely practical.
The décor matched the worship service, thoroughly contemporary and professional. The people who led the service seemed educated and at ease in their task of addressing so large a crowd. The printed materials were full color brochures which not only told about that evening’s worship service, but also about all the activities and programs that the church offers. Overall, all these factors create a sense of “aliveness.”
Everyone around us sang during the appropriate times. I noticed that most everyone took Communion when the plate was passed. People were very attentive to the pastor’s message. I have been in few churches where everyone seemed to be so utterly engaged in the program and in all that was taking place. People applauded when the baptisms were finished, signaling that everyone understood this as a crucial event in a person’s life.
I felt that Communion was taken reverently by the people around me, but since there was very little comment from the stage about the significance of Communion, I cannot describe the individual’s understanding of this ordinance. It seemed to be an intimate moment between the individual and God rather than a corporate event.
The way that this church took Communion is deficient for several reasons. First, there is no clear explanation of the significance of Communion. Neither is there any discussion about who is eligible to receive the elements. Secondly, a newcomer to the church would not know what to do in this situation. Communion takes place in the middle of the service, before the sermon. It is an intimate time of personal reflection. Little emphasis is placed on the corporate “coming together” at the table of the Lord.
Immediately following Communion is the ordinance of baptism. I must admit that I enjoyed the way that the service structure joined the two ordinances side by side in this way. Still, the lack of explanation of Communion’s significance needs to be addressed.
Every worship has a theology, be it sound or errant. The church’s worship service began with the song “Holy is the Lord God Almighty,” a song that speaks of how the earth is filled with His glory. From the start of the service, we were invited to worship a holy and powerful Creator God.
Another song was “God is Great,” about the awesomeness of God’s character. We sang “Amazing Grace,” which explained that salvation is by grace alone for wretched sinners.
“Made Me Glad” was taken directly from a psalm that speaks of what God has done for His children. Overall, I believe the songs chosen helped bring God’s transcendence into view, while the atmosphere of the church emphasized His imminence.
The church’s role in the life of a believer was most evident in the child dedication ceremony, when the parents committed to raise their children in the fear of the Lord and the church committed to assisting them in this God-given task. Even in a church this large, the covenantal aspect of church membership shined through in this moment.
The service’s climax is the pastor’s sermon. The Bible message is given preeminence over all other aspects of the service, including the singing. The sermon was very practical and accessible. People seemed to understand the pastor’s message and I saw many people nodding their heads in agreement.
The sermon explained both what salvation is, and who Jesus is. I must give credit to the pastor for crafting a sermon that explained the Holy Spirit’s power in the life of Stephen, while maintaining a strong evangelistic emphasis.
One of the songs was taken almost directly from a psalm. During Communion, Philippians 3:10-11 appeared on the large screen behind the stage. The pastor read selected portions from Acts 6-7 as the main text for his sermon. Besides the pastor’s reading, there was no other public reading of Scripture aloud.
The songs were uplifting and God-centered, so I did feel encouraged to praise God. The sermon was Bible-based, and God did speak to us through His Word.
The impression one gets from visiting this church is big! Everything is big, from the sound, the screens, the auditorium, to the sermon. It is easy to feel as if you are only a spectator and not a participant, due to the size of the crowd.
The worship service falls somewhere in between formal and informal worship style. The service itself is very structured, so it would be a mistake to consider it informal in its presentation, as if everything were spontaneous or off-the-cuff. At the same time, the atmosphere is informal. Some people are dressed casually, while others are dressed in suits and ties. The worship team was dressed in “snappy-casual” attire. This juxtaposition of structure and informality does not a create dissonance, however; instead, it seeks to make the service accessible to the greatest number of people possible.
I grew up in a Baptist church that was a little more traditional in its musical style. Still, I must say that I am familiar with this type of worship service. My home church follows a similar order of service, and the climax is the sermon there as well. I got the feeling that the church is something like what my home church would be if it were 20 times larger.
My wife and I enjoyed our visit to this mega-church. We both felt that the Spirit of God is at work in this community of believers. Even though there were some aspects of the service that we felt could be improved, we believe that this worship service was honoring to God in the way it centered on God’s character and taught about salvation as His gift of free grace to sinners.
© Copyright by Trevin Wax |
Print This Post | Share (Twitter, Email, Facebook)



Excellent post Trevin. Thanks for sharing these experiences w/ us.
Jimmy Fine | Mar 25, 2009 | Reply
One can get lost in a mega-church, and sit down on the stool of do-nothing. Also a pastor can only shepherd 100 people at the most.
The church is not to be a place of entertainment, and I hate contemporary music.
Their praise sessions simply repeat the same words over and over again.
I prefer the Broadman Hymnal, and using the King James 1611 Bible.
Dr. Paul W. Foltz | Mar 25, 2009 | Reply
I would imagine the challenge for the leadership of a mega church is… How do we make next week’s experience bigger and better than this week’s? If my kids went to such a service, they’d likely speak of how cool it is, not boring like our service. But, I imagine these churches have a near 100% turnover every couple of years. Previous folks move on, and newer folks are attracted by the spectacle. All in all, I applaud the vigor with which the leadership approaches things. I consider it misguided in a sense, but I’m glad they are sincerely seeking to win souls. Question: how big must a church be to be considered a mega church. My Catholic parish has 900 families. Assuming 4 members per family that’s 3600 folks. We have 4 different services, so you get a few hundred at each, but since attendance is spread out, we don’t have the megachurch feel. This is fairly typical, for the average US Catholic parish has 2000 members.
Brian | Mar 25, 2009 | Reply
Great post Trevin, but I kept wondering “why did he go to the Mormon Tabernacle in Salt Lake for this visit?
Jeff Ling | Mar 25, 2009 | Reply
Trevin, I am intrigued by your critique of the Catholic service, and your kudos to this one, on the basis of the presence or absence of an evangelistic, cross-centered component to the message. I realize this may come partly from your Baptist tradition, as I remember several of the Baptist churches I have attended made a deliberate choice to have an altar-call or invitation at each service.
But I know plenty of other churches that, while as evangelical in their mindset as these, still look upon the Sunday worship service as primarily a time for worshipping God and teaching the flock. This is a conscious choice, just as much as having an invitation and/or evangelistic message is a choice. I’m not sure it is fair to criticize (or compliment) a church for the evangelistic content (or lack thereof) in the worship service, as they very well may be highly evangelistic in other contexts such as their service projects, the ways they mobilize their members to reach out, etc.
I have seen enough of your other posts to realize (I think) that you see the gospel in much broader terms than simply getting people to intellectually assent to the proposition of Jesus’ saving work on the cross & subsequent resurrection. It would seem to me that the notion of “preach Christ. . .when necessary, use words” would suggest that one has to dig a lot deeper into the life of a church in order to determine if they are or are not a force for the kingdom.
I may be over-analyzing your critique, but to me it seems in some ways to repudiate the more kingdom-living style of outreach and church life. I doubt that was your intention. . .
Peace!
Dan Martin | Mar 25, 2009 | Reply
Dan,
I am not critiquing either church for the lack of altar call or evangelistic thrust. (One of the things that bugs me about American evangelicalism is the equating of altar call with evangelism, as if you haven’t done evangelism without an altar call, or that the mere presence of an altar call is equal to evangelism. Both those assumptions are wrong.)
I suppose I should have been more clear in my critique. As an outsider to both these churches, I was approaching the evangelism issue with this question. If I as an average Joe have come to this worship service, what would I know about God and Jesus, the cross, the gospel, and what God expects of me? Am I to repent? How do I follow Jesus? Who would I talk to about getting more info, etc.?
I was not intending to critique the churches regarding altar calls (I don’t think I even mentioned them), but regarding the lost stranger in their midst. Was the gospel presented clearly enough that the lost person would know what God is calling them to do? Of course, the worship service on Sunday is for the faithful (and ultimately it is God serving us… I understand all that). My question relates more to the presence of the gospel and how it permeates our services.
I hope that clarifies my thoughts somewhat…
Trevin Wax | Mar 25, 2009 | Reply
At the very least, Trevin, it clarifies that I asked my question badly! ;{) I should not have put the phrase “altar call” in there because you did not imply one was necessary. I apologize.
But the point I MEANT to make, was that if a congregation sees the worship service as primarily for the edification and preparation of the believer, is that not a valid choice? In that case, a newcomer might not encounter the salvation message on any given Sunday because the congregation is dining on meat, not milk.
In other words, I am questioning what sounds to me like a basic assumption on your part, that the Sunday (or whenever) worship service should be primarily, or at least significantly, a proselytizing tool rather than primarily for the edification and preparation of the body to serve. It is that assumption that troubles me, as I feel that a properly-trained and growing congregation will do its most effective witness/recruitment/whatever in its life outside the bounds of the sanctuary.
I’m not criticizing those churches who DO choose to have their services focus on the evangelistic side, as long as they also provide significant opportunities for deeper study and teaching as well. I’m merely pointing out that the choice to focus on one or the other can (actually, SHOULD) be a deliberate choice, and either option can be chosen out of a sincere commitment to making disciples.
Am I more clear this time?
Dan Martin | Mar 25, 2009 | Reply
Dan,
I think you are right that churches should not have to choose between edification or evangelism. The assumption that I find in your question leads me to believe that a clear presentation of the gospel is evangelism, while edification is something else. I would rather say that we are both evangelized and edified by the gospel itself. So that the gospel as it permeates the songs, Scriptures, sermons, etc. winds up edifying the saints and doing the work of calling to the unbeliever.
I think we are both talking around the very same idea, only I’d like to clarify that the gospel does the work of edification and evangelization at the same time. I’m not saying we have to completely tailor the services for one side or the other.
Trevin Wax | Mar 25, 2009 | Reply
May I ask and will you inform me of which mega-church you attended?
For those who critique mega-churches, perhaps you could attend one sometime.
Eric Peterson | Mar 25, 2009 | Reply
Really appreciate your gracious work on these review, Trevin. Keep up the good work, I endeavour to help with promoting your good work where I can on me blog likewise.
Shalom
dmcd
stokecoglife | Mar 25, 2009 | Reply
Trevin,
Well done critique. There is much to be commended in services such as the one that you attended and there is no doubt much good that is happening. My biggest concern about mega-churches is whether they will prove to be sustainable over the long haul, both economically and in terms of the very talented staff that it takes to pull these kind of weekly events off. We’ll see.
On a broader note one of my nagging complaints (one you mentioned) in many evangelical churches is the way that communion is done. It is often very impersonal, lacking reverence, non-participative; eat, drink, pass your cups to the inside aisles, next item on the agenda please. When did we start using those silly plastic cups and crumbled crackers??? Visited an emergent church a while back and they did communion in a very creative yet traditional and meaningful way. Would love to see more churches do better at this most importance ordinance.
Charlie | Mar 25, 2009 | Reply