The Ironies of the “Church is Lame” Crowd

Why We Love the Church: In Praise of Institutions and Organized ReligionI loved this excerpt from Kevin DeYoung and Ted Kluck’s book, Why We Love the Church.

Consistency is not a postmodern virtue. And nowhere is this more aptly displayed than in the barrage of criticisms leveled against the church.

  • The church-is-lame crowd hates Constantine and notions of Christendom, but they want the church to be a patron of the arts, and run after-school programs, and bring the world together in peace and love.
  • They bemoan the over-programmed church, but then think of a hundred complex resource-hungry things the church should be doing.
  • They don’t like the church because it is too hierarchical, , but then hate it when it has poor leadership.
  • They wish the church could be more diverse, but then leave to meet in a coffee ship with other well-educated thirtysomethings who are into film festivals, NPR, and carbon offsets.
  • They want more of a family spirit, but too much family and they’ll complain that the church is “inbred.”
  • They want the church to know that its reputation with the outsiders is terrible, but then are critical they the church is too concerned with appearances.
  • They chide the church for not doing more to address social problems, but then complain when the church gets too political.
  • They want church unity and decry all our denominations, but fail to see the irony in the fact that they have left to do their own thing because they can’t find a single church that can satisfy them.
  • They are critical of the lack of community in the church, but then want services that allow for individualized worship experiences.
  • They want leaders with vision, but don’t want anyone to tell them what to do or how to think.
  • They want a church where the people really know each other and care for each other, but then they complain the church today is an isolated country club, only interested in catering to its own members.
  • They want to be connected with history, but are sick of the same prayers and same style every week.
  • They call for not judging “the spiritual path of other believers who are dedicated to pleasing God and blessing people,” and then they blast the traditional church in the harshest, most unflattering terms.”

© Copyright by Trevin Wax | Print This Post Print This Post | Share (Twitter, Email, Facebook)

5 Comment(s)

  1. Great excerpt! Thanks for sharing!

    Dave

    David Wakerley | Nov 9, 2009 | Reply

  2. That was one of my favorite parts as well, along with the chapter rebutting Pagan Christianity.

    Aaron Armstrong | Nov 9, 2009 | Reply

  3. You could say that Consistency is not a postmodern virtue because a foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds.

    Peace.

    Mich | Nov 9, 2009 | Reply

  4. This sounds like a radical conservative bashing of “liberals” to me more than a constructive critique. Of course there is some truth to all these rantings but I would say it is not generally characteristic of many who the authors seem to want to stick their labels on.

    If the current day church cannot take any constructive criticisms then they are indeed in trouble. I am not insinuating that all critism against the church is constructive but I think some part of it is. There is plenty of room for improvements in bringing the masses to Christ. If we were perfect in our evangelism then church attendance would be increase not decreasing as it has for the last 15 or more years.

    Let’s not take all criticisms as attacks.

    RJ | Nov 9, 2009 | Reply

  5. It’s very easy to take a not unreasonable criticism, twist it into a straw man and give a snappy sarcastic answer to a different question. A one line rebuttal of each of these straw men would be equally easy but hardly worth the effort.

    Jon Bartlett | Nov 10, 2009 | Reply

Post a Comment